Well, for those of you that are actually interested in understanding the background to Mugabe's recent antics, (beyond the 'just another mad African dictator,' common 'wisdom,') here is a well researched paper on the history of Zimbabwe's land situation. It seems Mugabe maybe right about this land thing as well...
http://ccrweb.ccr.uct.ac.za/archive/two/9_1/zimbabwe.html
Monday, 24 December 2007
Wednesday, 24 October 2007
Mugabe, Dr James Watson and a 'Nigga'
With all this hype in America concerning use of the 'N-word' in mainstream media, does today's African/Negro actually have a clue as to what their position is in all this this debate? In that light, and following all that other noise, in response to that gene dude, Doctor Watson's recent comments to the press, I received this most interesting article indeed via email. This is THE TRUTH... Something I feel every person of Negro/African origin should read. I recommend making some proper time to comprehensively go through it.
Africans arise!
""Well, the smiley guy above, Dr James Watson, (who's a Nobel Prize winning genetic scientist by the way.., a pioneers in DNA science apparently,) caused quite a stir last week. All sides of the PC brigade, including the perennially pissed Black Activists & etc, were up in arms, fighting to stuff the proverbial gag down the old buggers throat. The rage was in response to a scientific, 'observation,' our Dr Watson is said to have made... Basically, he felt that, all objective research he's had access to in his career, leaves him convinced of the fact that, the Negro race is less intelligent than its Caucasoid counterpart.
Now, before Y'all go off eating Your head wear, I would like to start by noting that I, for one, do see quite some sense in our good doctor's sentiments! So much so, that I've decided to don Dr James Watson, one of my honorary, 'Patron,' mudzimu, a flag bearer in the African's current struggle to remember her relevance...
I mean firstly, it is important to understand that, in an objective sense, there is nothing wrong with someone's being bold enough to draw our attention to aspects they perceive as physiological differences, between the races that comprise our species! In fact, this is a discussion that is, these days, often suppressed, in the interests of 'correctness..,' yet we all know how feelings that are not at least expressed, often turn into the more dangerous feelings, such as resentment and hatred. I mean lets be real people, as Africans, don't we all relate to the fact that our Western cousins' womenfolk, 'generally,' exhibit a less pronounced figure in that all important, 'booty,' department..? Off course, we don't consider it racist to speak on this topic, in fact often revelling in this, 'generalisation,' the many times we point it out!? Alas, if only there was some doctorate in Bootology to validate our great understanding in this matter! (Hello '...honkies have no rhythm...'!??)
To be fair, racism is based on such sweeping generalisations.., and despite the fact such generalisations are in themselves dangerous to make.., really, it is when we begin to prejudge individuals we encounter based on these generalisation, that it becomes racism. When we interact with someone based on prejudgement, we deprive them the opportunity to be an individual.., and in the process, often deprive ourselves of potentially enriching experiences... (hello Rhodies!)
Anyway, what I am in essence trying to say is that, there was nothing wrong with Dr Watson presenting his, 'hypothesis'! As a man who's spent most of his time studying the so-called, building blocks of human physiology, (these, 'genes..,') isn't he reasonably placed to make an objective observation on such matters..? However, it is important to start by noting that there are two aspects to his assertion;
Of course he is firstly stating that, his studies show him that there is a genetic/physiological DIFFERENCE, in terms of intellect, between the two races.., This is in my view, a fair point, and one that would be supported by most other scientific observation at our disposal. In this, I am referring to the fact that we, as human beings, should start openly acknowledging and exploring the fact that, there are physiological differences between races in our species. I mean, beyond the 'ass' assertion already laboured above, comparative variation in melanin content between these two races, is in itself another outward, physiological manifestation, of a difference that exists on the genetic level. So, on this aspect, I essentially agree with, and applaud, Doctor Watson's 'boldness.'
Now, there is a second element to Dr Watson's observation. This is in the fact his statements also imply that, his observations leave him convinced the African is LESS intelligent than the Westerner.., Now this, this I find most interesting indeed.., a QUALITATIVE / QUANTITATIVE deduction... I mean what he is saying here is that, by his EVALUATION, the physiological DIFFERENCE in intellect he has observed, is TIPPED in a way that puts the Westerner at an ADVANTAGE... ie, there is a difference, and this difference is in the favour of the Westerner.
Now I'm sure Y'all can sense where I'm going with this... To help us, we could quickly turn to that, 'great,' Western, 'intellect,' Einstein, with his theory of RELATIVITY.., ie; when You propose that a DIFFERENCE between two points, may be balanced in the FAVOUR of one of these sides, You must always remember that; i) the, 'perception,' of what counts as being an advantage, will differ, depending on position, relative to the sides, from which You make Your evaluation.., and that ii) In arriving at Your deduction, You may be depending on a unit/value of evaluation that may in reality, only be uniquely relevant to Yourself! So simply put, what I am asking is, by whose authority/values/standard, is Doctor Watson concluding that, between his two, 'versions,' of human intellect, the Africans' proves inferior?
It is on this point that Doctor Watson proves himself bullsh%t, racist, supremacist and imperialist all at once.., in that, his assertion proposes whatever his value of measurement is, as absolute! Madness... This is why I found this whole kafaffule extremely interesting.., in that it exposes the deeper level on which racism actually resides. This almost instinctive assumption by Westerners that their units of value are the absolutes... (think when they decide to launch vessels into space, beaming all types of radiation via our collective atmosphere.., I'd be surprised to learn of any African who's ever been included in the conversation on the intelligence of such actions...) Fortunately, on another level, this also highlighted to me the true area through which the African continues to be kept under the Westerner's colonial control... The African lives, and evaluates, his life against a value system that is not his own.
To fully understand this, lets go back to this issue of genetics. So far, we have sort of sketched out a scenario in which we more or less observe the African, (predominantly negroid,) to variously be genetically different to the Westerner, (read Caucasoid.) We've also seen how such differences are often construed to further supremacist views. Now it would be wrong to front like Dr Watson and his fellow Westerners are alone in this area of racial supremacy..! Black supremacists are another quite well known faction! The 'Anti-Watson's' of sorts!
Now, I want to point out something such fellows may find quite alarming indeed... Basically most Black supremacists base their position on the scientific findings that show Africa, (and hence the aboriginal African,) as the ancestral cradle of human life. What they seem to ignore, is the fact that today's Negroid is in reality, mostly descendant of the Nubic-Bantu, a relatively modern Negroid strand.., (that became distinguishable in parts of North-East Africa around 10 000 BC.) More so, genetically, this Negroid strand is more than likely a cross between the earlier, aboriginal African already outlined, and.., (hold on to Your seats for this..,) a Caucasoid influence that migrated across the Red Sea, into the horn of East Africa around 15 000BC* (*The Roots of the Bantu - A Chigwedere - ISBN 0-7974-1852-0)
I wont delve too deeply into this history here, (as all the resources one needs to learn more on this subject, are easily 'googleable,' via Your very same PC..,) but for starters, physiologically, today's negroid displays a broader range of height variance within its members, than would be expected if she were purely descendant of the aboriginal African, (who were pygmy/dwarf-like in stature.) After 10 000BC, the negroid that's then seen to spread across the African continent, (eventually swallowing up, and overshadowing, its dwarf-like aboriginal predecessor,) is the actual forefather of today's Negro.
Now, although this resultant Negro does exhibit some features imparted by the Caucasoid influence, a few generations of interbreeding down the line, ensured the prevailing dominance of its majority, aboriginal, genes.
This is significant in that it implies that, of the many races walking the earth today, the Negro is likely the most direct genetic descendant of the aboriginal African... Hence, (leading from the inference of Africa being the cradle of life,) its sensible to deduce that, today's Negro race, may safeguard the gene pool most closely related to this planet's earliest evolutionary source. In other words, today's African could be said to have the strongest rooting in the original, native gene pool of this planet... ie, in their most natural state, Negroes may genetically have been better suited to co-existing harmoniously within the habitat of this planet...
As we reflect on that, lets return to our good friend Watson.., as this point is important for today's Negro to understand! It is actually great that this Western scientist is making it possible to openly have this conversation! Maybe this will bring Negroes back to terms with the simple, commonsense knowledge-of-self, that's eluded them for the longest time. Returning to his assertion concerning a superiority of Western intelligence.., so far, we've objectively built a case that, hypothetically, supports part of his assertion, in that, yes, we agree there may be a difference between the two races' intelligences.
However, (in light of our effort to trace the genetic roots of today's African,) could we then, not also now say the following; from the point-of-view of suitability, to naturally, & sustainably, thrive within this planet's ecology, the African's intelligence may likely be better suited? (In that African intelligence, may, genetically, be the one closer linked to the earliest, harmonic ecology that allowed life on this planet to thrive in the first place..?)
As You see, there is a difference in our assertion here, because, unlike Dr Watson, we have qualified it with a point of reference.., "from the point-of-view," Even more-so, could we not also say, the African's intelligence is likely to be the best suited to cope with life in the environment of Africa?
I mean, a simple parallel lies in the obvious aspect of the variance in melanin levels, source of the two races' distinct skin complexions. From the point-of-view of most of the life-forms native to this planet, melanin is crucial to harmonising interactions with sunlight. Hence in this aspect, in line with most other earth-native species, we see the African exhibiting a well suited genetic default.., never really requiring the aid of, 'artificially,' fabricated sun-creams so common among Westerners. Off course, some scientist argue that Africans' levels of melanin puts them at disadvantage in regions where sunlight is less abundant.., (in respect to synthesis of vitamin D..,) however, this again highlights the importance of the point-of-reference, when making comparative judgements.
In closing, we've seen through all this, that, in order for a group of people to weigh something, they must first agree on a common point of reference, and/or, unit of measurement... A point that may be very important for today's African to grasp. He who controls the scales, controls the sale. Do today's Africans truly have their own unit of self-value..? And because we have seen that in determining a unit of evaluation, having a point of reference is crucial.., can we not see that, by conditioning us out of the knowledge, (and appreciation,) of our true relevance, (our true significance in the picture of life as it exists on this planet,) we have been left open to our current condition.., a condition in which we weigh out all aspects of our self-worth, based on a value system that is largely alien to us.
Today's African, strives to achieve and measure their, 'progress,' against a value-system that definitely belongs to the Western genetic strand. We need to STOP. Externalising the values and beliefs of, 'the natives,' was always the front-line of attack, in the Weterners' process of colonial aggression.., be it on the spiritual, language, economic or educational levels. Once someone starts to evaluate themselves by a standard whose tone You dictate, (more so when they even begin to subconsciously accept it as the only possible, universal, standard,) You do not even need to remain present to keep them under Your control! You can be far away, and rest assured Your subjects will police themselves, even passing Your values on to their own future off-spring! (hello Y'all Africans with dodgy Catholic names!)
I would like to assert that, the only way today's African can achieve real progress, is by taking charge of re-aligning himself with his true genetic self-worth. We must remember who we are, and remember our own native values... We must redefine the units against which we measure our progress as a race. As long as the continent continues to aspire to this Western, synthetic and materialistic concepts of, 'development,' the African will continue to be a second rate citizen, trapped in a never-ending game of catch-up. For starters, this whole, "money," system.., a system we place so much confidence in, despite the fact we have very little say in its operation..? It's all like trying to win a game in which Your opponent is the only one allowed to dictate the rules!
Africa wake up! What values were of real importance to those long gone, original African ancestors of ours.., that foremost gene pool, fore-runner of all races that call this planet home..? That creature that lived sustainably, among, and at one, with its surroundings..? It seems in a way, we must all let our dominant, (but now dormant,) African genes, temper the Western influence.., which is now currently threatening all our chances of continued existence on this planet...
So that African intelligence will rise to prominence once again.
Thanks again dear Watson..!
Signed, Sherlock""
Africans arise!
""Well, the smiley guy above, Dr James Watson, (who's a Nobel Prize winning genetic scientist by the way.., a pioneers in DNA science apparently,) caused quite a stir last week. All sides of the PC brigade, including the perennially pissed Black Activists & etc, were up in arms, fighting to stuff the proverbial gag down the old buggers throat. The rage was in response to a scientific, 'observation,' our Dr Watson is said to have made... Basically, he felt that, all objective research he's had access to in his career, leaves him convinced of the fact that, the Negro race is less intelligent than its Caucasoid counterpart.
Now, before Y'all go off eating Your head wear, I would like to start by noting that I, for one, do see quite some sense in our good doctor's sentiments! So much so, that I've decided to don Dr James Watson, one of my honorary, 'Patron,' mudzimu, a flag bearer in the African's current struggle to remember her relevance...
I mean firstly, it is important to understand that, in an objective sense, there is nothing wrong with someone's being bold enough to draw our attention to aspects they perceive as physiological differences, between the races that comprise our species! In fact, this is a discussion that is, these days, often suppressed, in the interests of 'correctness..,' yet we all know how feelings that are not at least expressed, often turn into the more dangerous feelings, such as resentment and hatred. I mean lets be real people, as Africans, don't we all relate to the fact that our Western cousins' womenfolk, 'generally,' exhibit a less pronounced figure in that all important, 'booty,' department..? Off course, we don't consider it racist to speak on this topic, in fact often revelling in this, 'generalisation,' the many times we point it out!? Alas, if only there was some doctorate in Bootology to validate our great understanding in this matter! (Hello '...honkies have no rhythm...'!??)
To be fair, racism is based on such sweeping generalisations.., and despite the fact such generalisations are in themselves dangerous to make.., really, it is when we begin to prejudge individuals we encounter based on these generalisation, that it becomes racism. When we interact with someone based on prejudgement, we deprive them the opportunity to be an individual.., and in the process, often deprive ourselves of potentially enriching experiences... (hello Rhodies!)
Anyway, what I am in essence trying to say is that, there was nothing wrong with Dr Watson presenting his, 'hypothesis'! As a man who's spent most of his time studying the so-called, building blocks of human physiology, (these, 'genes..,') isn't he reasonably placed to make an objective observation on such matters..? However, it is important to start by noting that there are two aspects to his assertion;
Of course he is firstly stating that, his studies show him that there is a genetic/physiological DIFFERENCE, in terms of intellect, between the two races.., This is in my view, a fair point, and one that would be supported by most other scientific observation at our disposal. In this, I am referring to the fact that we, as human beings, should start openly acknowledging and exploring the fact that, there are physiological differences between races in our species. I mean, beyond the 'ass' assertion already laboured above, comparative variation in melanin content between these two races, is in itself another outward, physiological manifestation, of a difference that exists on the genetic level. So, on this aspect, I essentially agree with, and applaud, Doctor Watson's 'boldness.'
Now, there is a second element to Dr Watson's observation. This is in the fact his statements also imply that, his observations leave him convinced the African is LESS intelligent than the Westerner.., Now this, this I find most interesting indeed.., a QUALITATIVE / QUANTITATIVE deduction... I mean what he is saying here is that, by his EVALUATION, the physiological DIFFERENCE in intellect he has observed, is TIPPED in a way that puts the Westerner at an ADVANTAGE... ie, there is a difference, and this difference is in the favour of the Westerner.
Now I'm sure Y'all can sense where I'm going with this... To help us, we could quickly turn to that, 'great,' Western, 'intellect,' Einstein, with his theory of RELATIVITY.., ie; when You propose that a DIFFERENCE between two points, may be balanced in the FAVOUR of one of these sides, You must always remember that; i) the, 'perception,' of what counts as being an advantage, will differ, depending on position, relative to the sides, from which You make Your evaluation.., and that ii) In arriving at Your deduction, You may be depending on a unit/value of evaluation that may in reality, only be uniquely relevant to Yourself! So simply put, what I am asking is, by whose authority/values/standard, is Doctor Watson concluding that, between his two, 'versions,' of human intellect, the Africans' proves inferior?
It is on this point that Doctor Watson proves himself bullsh%t, racist, supremacist and imperialist all at once.., in that, his assertion proposes whatever his value of measurement is, as absolute! Madness... This is why I found this whole kafaffule extremely interesting.., in that it exposes the deeper level on which racism actually resides. This almost instinctive assumption by Westerners that their units of value are the absolutes... (think when they decide to launch vessels into space, beaming all types of radiation via our collective atmosphere.., I'd be surprised to learn of any African who's ever been included in the conversation on the intelligence of such actions...) Fortunately, on another level, this also highlighted to me the true area through which the African continues to be kept under the Westerner's colonial control... The African lives, and evaluates, his life against a value system that is not his own.
To fully understand this, lets go back to this issue of genetics. So far, we have sort of sketched out a scenario in which we more or less observe the African, (predominantly negroid,) to variously be genetically different to the Westerner, (read Caucasoid.) We've also seen how such differences are often construed to further supremacist views. Now it would be wrong to front like Dr Watson and his fellow Westerners are alone in this area of racial supremacy..! Black supremacists are another quite well known faction! The 'Anti-Watson's' of sorts!
Now, I want to point out something such fellows may find quite alarming indeed... Basically most Black supremacists base their position on the scientific findings that show Africa, (and hence the aboriginal African,) as the ancestral cradle of human life. What they seem to ignore, is the fact that today's Negroid is in reality, mostly descendant of the Nubic-Bantu, a relatively modern Negroid strand.., (that became distinguishable in parts of North-East Africa around 10 000 BC.) More so, genetically, this Negroid strand is more than likely a cross between the earlier, aboriginal African already outlined, and.., (hold on to Your seats for this..,) a Caucasoid influence that migrated across the Red Sea, into the horn of East Africa around 15 000BC* (*The Roots of the Bantu - A Chigwedere - ISBN 0-7974-1852-0)
I wont delve too deeply into this history here, (as all the resources one needs to learn more on this subject, are easily 'googleable,' via Your very same PC..,) but for starters, physiologically, today's negroid displays a broader range of height variance within its members, than would be expected if she were purely descendant of the aboriginal African, (who were pygmy/dwarf-like in stature.) After 10 000BC, the negroid that's then seen to spread across the African continent, (eventually swallowing up, and overshadowing, its dwarf-like aboriginal predecessor,) is the actual forefather of today's Negro.
Now, although this resultant Negro does exhibit some features imparted by the Caucasoid influence, a few generations of interbreeding down the line, ensured the prevailing dominance of its majority, aboriginal, genes.
This is significant in that it implies that, of the many races walking the earth today, the Negro is likely the most direct genetic descendant of the aboriginal African... Hence, (leading from the inference of Africa being the cradle of life,) its sensible to deduce that, today's Negro race, may safeguard the gene pool most closely related to this planet's earliest evolutionary source. In other words, today's African could be said to have the strongest rooting in the original, native gene pool of this planet... ie, in their most natural state, Negroes may genetically have been better suited to co-existing harmoniously within the habitat of this planet...
As we reflect on that, lets return to our good friend Watson.., as this point is important for today's Negro to understand! It is actually great that this Western scientist is making it possible to openly have this conversation! Maybe this will bring Negroes back to terms with the simple, commonsense knowledge-of-self, that's eluded them for the longest time. Returning to his assertion concerning a superiority of Western intelligence.., so far, we've objectively built a case that, hypothetically, supports part of his assertion, in that, yes, we agree there may be a difference between the two races' intelligences.
However, (in light of our effort to trace the genetic roots of today's African,) could we then, not also now say the following; from the point-of-view of suitability, to naturally, & sustainably, thrive within this planet's ecology, the African's intelligence may likely be better suited? (In that African intelligence, may, genetically, be the one closer linked to the earliest, harmonic ecology that allowed life on this planet to thrive in the first place..?)
As You see, there is a difference in our assertion here, because, unlike Dr Watson, we have qualified it with a point of reference.., "from the point-of-view," Even more-so, could we not also say, the African's intelligence is likely to be the best suited to cope with life in the environment of Africa?
I mean, a simple parallel lies in the obvious aspect of the variance in melanin levels, source of the two races' distinct skin complexions. From the point-of-view of most of the life-forms native to this planet, melanin is crucial to harmonising interactions with sunlight. Hence in this aspect, in line with most other earth-native species, we see the African exhibiting a well suited genetic default.., never really requiring the aid of, 'artificially,' fabricated sun-creams so common among Westerners. Off course, some scientist argue that Africans' levels of melanin puts them at disadvantage in regions where sunlight is less abundant.., (in respect to synthesis of vitamin D..,) however, this again highlights the importance of the point-of-reference, when making comparative judgements.
In closing, we've seen through all this, that, in order for a group of people to weigh something, they must first agree on a common point of reference, and/or, unit of measurement... A point that may be very important for today's African to grasp. He who controls the scales, controls the sale. Do today's Africans truly have their own unit of self-value..? And because we have seen that in determining a unit of evaluation, having a point of reference is crucial.., can we not see that, by conditioning us out of the knowledge, (and appreciation,) of our true relevance, (our true significance in the picture of life as it exists on this planet,) we have been left open to our current condition.., a condition in which we weigh out all aspects of our self-worth, based on a value system that is largely alien to us.
Today's African, strives to achieve and measure their, 'progress,' against a value-system that definitely belongs to the Western genetic strand. We need to STOP. Externalising the values and beliefs of, 'the natives,' was always the front-line of attack, in the Weterners' process of colonial aggression.., be it on the spiritual, language, economic or educational levels. Once someone starts to evaluate themselves by a standard whose tone You dictate, (more so when they even begin to subconsciously accept it as the only possible, universal, standard,) You do not even need to remain present to keep them under Your control! You can be far away, and rest assured Your subjects will police themselves, even passing Your values on to their own future off-spring! (hello Y'all Africans with dodgy Catholic names!)
I would like to assert that, the only way today's African can achieve real progress, is by taking charge of re-aligning himself with his true genetic self-worth. We must remember who we are, and remember our own native values... We must redefine the units against which we measure our progress as a race. As long as the continent continues to aspire to this Western, synthetic and materialistic concepts of, 'development,' the African will continue to be a second rate citizen, trapped in a never-ending game of catch-up. For starters, this whole, "money," system.., a system we place so much confidence in, despite the fact we have very little say in its operation..? It's all like trying to win a game in which Your opponent is the only one allowed to dictate the rules!
Africa wake up! What values were of real importance to those long gone, original African ancestors of ours.., that foremost gene pool, fore-runner of all races that call this planet home..? That creature that lived sustainably, among, and at one, with its surroundings..? It seems in a way, we must all let our dominant, (but now dormant,) African genes, temper the Western influence.., which is now currently threatening all our chances of continued existence on this planet...
So that African intelligence will rise to prominence once again.
Thanks again dear Watson..!
Signed, Sherlock""
Wednesday, 17 October 2007
Mugabe's new "CIO" Hit-Team!?!
Wow, there is so much hatred in this cyber-world!! I've only blogged for 3 weeks and already I've got all the crazies coming out the wood work to spew hate, make threats and generally show the real racism that exists in our society! As I sit here in my humble Highfields abode, I've had 10 or so emails about how I am part of the dreaded "CIO"... how I'm a "Mugabe Crony" etc etc... Wow, for people who claim to have fled, 'tyranny,' to relocate in so-called Western 'democracys,' many seem to have a real problem with someone holding a view point different to the "Rhodie" or "BBC" status-co!
Have a read!
(YouTube Comment) Nigs in zimbabwe sit on some of the worlds best coal and they can't keep the lights on. Walk miles to carry water on their lice ridden heads because only whites can clean water. If you try to teach a nig to fish he will eat the bait, strangle someone with the line and give the hook to his baby to play with.
(Email) And now the West will have to feed these stupid niggers! Stop breeding and get off your lazy asses. These retarded nigs just sit there poking the ground with sticks and wondering how the white man made food pop out of the ground. Let them eat cake!
(Email) Zanoid C.I.O scum! you will hang with your master hahaha!!
YouTube Comment Stupid nigger! Bet you wish you had some food the white man didn't make. Bet you wish you had a roof over your nappy head, the white man didn't build. All niggers have AIDS and an IQ that would be called retarded by any other race. You shit skins can't even make it in 1st world countries because you are too damn retarded. Everyone thinks so even if they don't say it. LOL
Incredible! Anyway for every negative comment are 10 positive! Just like they have a "right" to say what they like, so do I!!
Have a read!
(YouTube Comment) Nigs in zimbabwe sit on some of the worlds best coal and they can't keep the lights on. Walk miles to carry water on their lice ridden heads because only whites can clean water. If you try to teach a nig to fish he will eat the bait, strangle someone with the line and give the hook to his baby to play with.
(Email) And now the West will have to feed these stupid niggers! Stop breeding and get off your lazy asses. These retarded nigs just sit there poking the ground with sticks and wondering how the white man made food pop out of the ground. Let them eat cake!
(Email) Zanoid C.I.O scum! you will hang with your master hahaha!!
YouTube Comment Stupid nigger! Bet you wish you had some food the white man didn't make. Bet you wish you had a roof over your nappy head, the white man didn't build. All niggers have AIDS and an IQ that would be called retarded by any other race. You shit skins can't even make it in 1st world countries because you are too damn retarded. Everyone thinks so even if they don't say it. LOL
Incredible! Anyway for every negative comment are 10 positive! Just like they have a "right" to say what they like, so do I!!
Wednesday, 3 October 2007
Mugabe seems to be Right about Sanctions..!
Just finished reading a quite interesting examination of the sanctions situation in Zimbabwe. Check it out;
Zimbabwe: The MDC Must Renounce the Sanctions
Zimbabwe: The MDC Must Renounce the Sanctions
Tuesday, 2 October 2007
Mugabe blaming non-existent Sanctions!?!?
It seems some of the Coons on the Oppressor's paycheck, have activated an attempt to suppress the real facts, about the nature of the sanctions Zimbabwe has been under. For the benefit of all, here is a link to an official US government site, on which you can personally examine the ZIDERA Act of 2001;
(the Zimbabwe, "Democracy," and Economic, "Recovery," Act of 2001)
This is one amongst many measures the Oppressor is using to constrain the day-to-day life, of common Zimbabweans. Notice how the sanctions described here, (despite the reverse Political language used to candy-coat them,) are not as, "smart," as many have been made to believe. The language clearly indicates a new financial attitude to, "Zimbabwe," as a nation,(see section 4c, for eg)
The fact Zimbabwe, as a nation, is under sanctions, is not an excuse for the economic pressure the People are bearing.., It is one of the reasons. Lets us be the ones who are, "smart."
(the Zimbabwe, "Democracy," and Economic, "Recovery," Act of 2001)
This is one amongst many measures the Oppressor is using to constrain the day-to-day life, of common Zimbabweans. Notice how the sanctions described here, (despite the reverse Political language used to candy-coat them,) are not as, "smart," as many have been made to believe. The language clearly indicates a new financial attitude to, "Zimbabwe," as a nation,(see section 4c, for eg)
The fact Zimbabwe, as a nation, is under sanctions, is not an excuse for the economic pressure the People are bearing.., It is one of the reasons. Lets us be the ones who are, "smart."
Mugabe V Elizabeth... Round 2 - Lancaster House Battle
We have established that, the Oppressors, stole the Second Chimurenga's victory, from the People, via Political force. The time and place of the Oppressors' historic second victory was 21 December 1979. The instrument of the victory was the Political, "agreement," that was reached, the Lancaster House Constitution.
Now, did You know that the United Kingdom, one of the biggest exporters of colonial, Oppressive, "ownership," in the last century, do not have a fixed, written constitution. Instead, so far believing governing laws and principles should evolve just as the life of thier country & its people evolve..: (external reference)
A constitution is by definition, a binding legal framework.., Further, in the case of the Lancaster House agreement, the Revolutionaries were talked into accepting that Zimbabwe would abide by by the Lancaster House Constitution for 10 years. In this light, it becomes VERY interesting to ask Yourself, in whose interest was it to bind Zimbabwe's formative years within the parammeters of a rigid constitution..?
Whenever people sit down to negotiate an agreement, which was in this Lancaster House case, a binding, "Constitution," it is safe to assume they do so based on thier interest in the matter being discussed. Because of this fact, it is possible to gain some understanding of exactly who had, and may still have, an interest in Zimbabwe.., simply by looking at the composition of the delegation present at that meeting in 1979. A quick scan of the list of delegates reveals 3 distinct, and evenly represented groups;
a) The Patriotic Front Delegation - (The Revolutionaries) - 21 delegates,
b) Zimbabwe rhodesia Delegation (The Occupying Oppressors & thier Coons) - 23 delegates,
c) The United Kingdom Delegation - (The Indirect Occupying Economy) - 22 delegates; (external reference)
Now, it is obvious why the Revoltionaries, (who fought on behalf of the People,) and the rhodies & Coons, (the settler minority, acting in the interests of self-preservation in the face of the popular revolt,) were well represented at this conference. What is interesting however, is the large UK delegation... The size of this delegation indicates that in 1980, the United Kingdom clearly had very strong interests in the goings on in Zimbabwe. Now, leading from the article on Chimurenga 3, we know that the parties sitting down to the Lancaster House conference were there because of an Economic issue. The People of Zimbabwe were using force in an attempt to reclaim thier basic means to production. So in this light, one must ask themselves, what was the extent of the UK's Economic interest in Zimbabwe, for them to post such a strong delegation at Lancaster House..?
As can be expected, in addition to delegates actually physically present during the 3 month long meeting, such delegates would have also spoken on behalf of the interests of other, non-present, shadow partners. In this respect, in the aftermath of the current ressurgence of Chimurenga in Zimbabwe, an interesting aspect has recently emerged.., This is the alleged crucial, but behind the scenes, role played by the the President of the United States, Jimmy Carter, via his ambassador in London, Kingman Brewster. As reported on the BBC's own website; (external reference)
- The talks headed for failure when the talks' chairman, Mr Carrington, presented the Revolutionaries a draft constitution that completely ignored the key Economic issue of land. Mugabe & Nkomo are said to have been furious. However, by his own account, the then Secretary General of the United Nations, Shiridath Ramphal, secured a promise from Jimmy Carter, that the US government, "would contribute a substantial amount for a process of land redistribution and they would undertake to encourage the British government to give similar assurances." This was a political promise that helped to coax the Revolutionaries back to the negotiating table. In addition, we should not forget the additional pressure the Revolutionaries were under, from the leaders of the frontline African nations. These are the countries whose peoples were directly bearing the great strain, of hosting the military operations of the Revolutionaries. For example, Tanzanian journalist Ben Mabula reports how Tanzania's then President, Mwalimu Julius Nyerere, told Mugabe to accept political independence first, and all else would follow..; (external refernece)
Now, is it wise for any thinking man/woman to assume that, since then, somewhere along the line, the very influential Oppressors that were so hard at work during the Lancaster House battle, have now somehow lost thier strong interest in Zimbabwe..? An interest they had been vigourously protecting their since the 1890s, first through military might, and then via political magic..? If one is to judge by the ammount of media coverage the Zimbabwe, "issue," continues to command in the UK & US media, it is safe to say that the fact is this.., the UK & US continue to have a strong interest in Zimbabwe. And, just as it was at the time of the first & second Chimurenga, and as it was at the cunning victory of Lancaster House, the interest of the Oppressor continues to primarily be Economic.
In closing, what all this means is that, at the point of birth of Zimbabwe's supposed, "independence," our Revolutionaries sat in the Oppressors' back garden, and were talked into binding themselves to laws set out in the language of the Oppressor.., Hence like Houdini, in a flash.., the main Economic issue was made to dissapper behind the smokescreen of Politics...
Now, did You know that the United Kingdom, one of the biggest exporters of colonial, Oppressive, "ownership," in the last century, do not have a fixed, written constitution. Instead, so far believing governing laws and principles should evolve just as the life of thier country & its people evolve..: (external reference)
A constitution is by definition, a binding legal framework.., Further, in the case of the Lancaster House agreement, the Revolutionaries were talked into accepting that Zimbabwe would abide by by the Lancaster House Constitution for 10 years. In this light, it becomes VERY interesting to ask Yourself, in whose interest was it to bind Zimbabwe's formative years within the parammeters of a rigid constitution..?
Whenever people sit down to negotiate an agreement, which was in this Lancaster House case, a binding, "Constitution," it is safe to assume they do so based on thier interest in the matter being discussed. Because of this fact, it is possible to gain some understanding of exactly who had, and may still have, an interest in Zimbabwe.., simply by looking at the composition of the delegation present at that meeting in 1979. A quick scan of the list of delegates reveals 3 distinct, and evenly represented groups;
a) The Patriotic Front Delegation - (The Revolutionaries) - 21 delegates,
b) Zimbabwe rhodesia Delegation (The Occupying Oppressors & thier Coons) - 23 delegates,
c) The United Kingdom Delegation - (The Indirect Occupying Economy) - 22 delegates; (external reference)
Now, it is obvious why the Revoltionaries, (who fought on behalf of the People,) and the rhodies & Coons, (the settler minority, acting in the interests of self-preservation in the face of the popular revolt,) were well represented at this conference. What is interesting however, is the large UK delegation... The size of this delegation indicates that in 1980, the United Kingdom clearly had very strong interests in the goings on in Zimbabwe. Now, leading from the article on Chimurenga 3, we know that the parties sitting down to the Lancaster House conference were there because of an Economic issue. The People of Zimbabwe were using force in an attempt to reclaim thier basic means to production. So in this light, one must ask themselves, what was the extent of the UK's Economic interest in Zimbabwe, for them to post such a strong delegation at Lancaster House..?
As can be expected, in addition to delegates actually physically present during the 3 month long meeting, such delegates would have also spoken on behalf of the interests of other, non-present, shadow partners. In this respect, in the aftermath of the current ressurgence of Chimurenga in Zimbabwe, an interesting aspect has recently emerged.., This is the alleged crucial, but behind the scenes, role played by the the President of the United States, Jimmy Carter, via his ambassador in London, Kingman Brewster. As reported on the BBC's own website; (external reference)
- The talks headed for failure when the talks' chairman, Mr Carrington, presented the Revolutionaries a draft constitution that completely ignored the key Economic issue of land. Mugabe & Nkomo are said to have been furious. However, by his own account, the then Secretary General of the United Nations, Shiridath Ramphal, secured a promise from Jimmy Carter, that the US government, "would contribute a substantial amount for a process of land redistribution and they would undertake to encourage the British government to give similar assurances." This was a political promise that helped to coax the Revolutionaries back to the negotiating table. In addition, we should not forget the additional pressure the Revolutionaries were under, from the leaders of the frontline African nations. These are the countries whose peoples were directly bearing the great strain, of hosting the military operations of the Revolutionaries. For example, Tanzanian journalist Ben Mabula reports how Tanzania's then President, Mwalimu Julius Nyerere, told Mugabe to accept political independence first, and all else would follow..; (external refernece)
Now, is it wise for any thinking man/woman to assume that, since then, somewhere along the line, the very influential Oppressors that were so hard at work during the Lancaster House battle, have now somehow lost thier strong interest in Zimbabwe..? An interest they had been vigourously protecting their since the 1890s, first through military might, and then via political magic..? If one is to judge by the ammount of media coverage the Zimbabwe, "issue," continues to command in the UK & US media, it is safe to say that the fact is this.., the UK & US continue to have a strong interest in Zimbabwe. And, just as it was at the time of the first & second Chimurenga, and as it was at the cunning victory of Lancaster House, the interest of the Oppressor continues to primarily be Economic.
In closing, what all this means is that, at the point of birth of Zimbabwe's supposed, "independence," our Revolutionaries sat in the Oppressors' back garden, and were talked into binding themselves to laws set out in the language of the Oppressor.., Hence like Houdini, in a flash.., the main Economic issue was made to dissapper behind the smokescreen of Politics...
Mugabe & Dodgy Football Politics
Zimbabwe is a country at war. Though many have said the land issue is Chimurenga 3, a new war.., the fact is that today's situation is a continuation of a problem Zimbabweans were tricked into thinking had gone away.
All of Zimbabwe's Chimurenga Uprisings centred on one basic thing, and one basic thing alone... The, "Peoples'," entitlement to a fair share in their most easily accessible means to production... The land they lived on. Now, in the first version of this uprising, the People were pacified by Brute force... They lay dormant for years, till they felt equipped enough to rise to action once more. This time, they proved irresistible.., but just before they could claim an undeniable victory, they were pacified once more... this time through cunning.., the cunning of Political force.
Our ageing generation of Revolutionaries is only now beginning to realise how at Lancaster House, London England, victory was stolen from the People once again.
Calling the Revolutionaries out from the bushes of the backyard they were beginning to claim back, to, "discuss things," at a meeting held in the Oppressors' own homeland, (over delightful teas & crumpets I suspect,) was a very great move! It bought the Revolutionaries, who were fighting on behalf of the People, into territory whose rules they were at that stage quite unfamiliar with. The Political territory.
Back then, as it still is today, Economics, - meaning access to the means to produce, - is the main area through which the few Oppressors control the many. Politics, meaning the policies used to administer the means of production, has come to be used by the, "owners," as a glorified form of management... Now where the, "owners," once were the People, Politics is now firmly in the hands of the few Oppressors. This means that in today's world, Politics and its politicians are controlled by those few who "own" our world. Politicians, such as Mugabe, Mbeki and the Bush's & Browns of this world, have become a buffer, behind which those with control of Economy can hide...
People generally "vote" for a government every 7 years... thus where a government could be focusing on doing good for those that elect them, they have to must every few years, divert their attention to fighting electoral fights. Those who "own" the economy are in no such dilemma. In fact many of today's multinational companies have been in the hands of the same families for generations! This allows them a continuity that ensures that the ideas their companies believe and act on, stay firmly within the control of the few, "owners." Yet it has come to be seen as normal, "democracy," that governments, who represent the much more important interests of the Greater Good, must keep changing like a game of musical chairs.
In the UK & US, standard bearers of today's modern "democracy," the people generally vote between the limited choice of either/or.., in that their are really only two main political parties in both countries. This is again a device that has developed to give those who, "own," the economy, further power to control politics. As opposed to those in politics working together on proper behalf of the people, to ensure the means of production are fairly managed, politics becomes about, "opposing," sides. This takes away from the role of politicians being servants, "ministers," chosen to co-operate in representing the collective interests of the People.., reducing Politics to something quite similar to the UK's premiership football!!
The tension between Chelsea & Manchester United fans produces alot of emotion in the fans who truly believe in, and place confidence in, 'their,' teams... They even buy, 'their,' teams respective Tshirts & scarfs! Then they pay to watch the games, in stadiums they passionately feel are, 'theirs...' On another level, You have the teams' players and managers.., in whom fanatical fans missplace even more of their faith in.., Treating Mourinho like the, "Speacial One," who will fight it out for them on the football pitch.., Yet, the players and managers, despite what they may say in TV interviews and at press events, have a more realistic view, in that behind closed doors, they know that they know who thier true masters are. As shown by Mourinho's assertion about, no longer caring about Chelsea, within a day of his dismissal, managers and players are really only mercenaries, who play actually for whichever club offers them the best deal... Hence all in all, it takes little genius to see how the only people who really benefit from all the fans' hot air, are the few Owners & Shareholders... These are the Oppressor few who really control these clubs...
Yet, since in today's times, the common Zimbabwean is continually being conditioned to keep believeing in the idea that, the only way to have a proper say, is through the political process.., those who really, "own,'" the powerless political 'teams,' continue to enjoy good hiding cover. Just like England's reknowned football hooligans, already struggling Zimbabweans are being manipulated, into having it out with each other in the streets, over a meaningless illusion.
So to start actually addressing the real problems of hunger and hopelessness plaguing our land, (very economic, "sadza & nyama," issues..,) we must start asking the right questions... Which are; who has, "owned," who, "owns," and who is trying to, "own," the means of production in Zimbabwe?
Because our country is in such a position where our People are struggling for just basic development, (where development does not relate to our People gaining access to a wider choice of consumer things to buy.., BUT true development, in the sense of them achieving the means to sustainably feed, house and clothe themselves..,) the questions turn into, who are the real people fighting so hard to either, keep, maintain or gain the, "ownership," of our country's most basic means of production... Our very Land itself. Which brings us back to where the first Chimurenga began.
All of Zimbabwe's Chimurenga Uprisings centred on one basic thing, and one basic thing alone... The, "Peoples'," entitlement to a fair share in their most easily accessible means to production... The land they lived on. Now, in the first version of this uprising, the People were pacified by Brute force... They lay dormant for years, till they felt equipped enough to rise to action once more. This time, they proved irresistible.., but just before they could claim an undeniable victory, they were pacified once more... this time through cunning.., the cunning of Political force.
Our ageing generation of Revolutionaries is only now beginning to realise how at Lancaster House, London England, victory was stolen from the People once again.
Calling the Revolutionaries out from the bushes of the backyard they were beginning to claim back, to, "discuss things," at a meeting held in the Oppressors' own homeland, (over delightful teas & crumpets I suspect,) was a very great move! It bought the Revolutionaries, who were fighting on behalf of the People, into territory whose rules they were at that stage quite unfamiliar with. The Political territory.
Back then, as it still is today, Economics, - meaning access to the means to produce, - is the main area through which the few Oppressors control the many. Politics, meaning the policies used to administer the means of production, has come to be used by the, "owners," as a glorified form of management... Now where the, "owners," once were the People, Politics is now firmly in the hands of the few Oppressors. This means that in today's world, Politics and its politicians are controlled by those few who "own" our world. Politicians, such as Mugabe, Mbeki and the Bush's & Browns of this world, have become a buffer, behind which those with control of Economy can hide...
People generally "vote" for a government every 7 years... thus where a government could be focusing on doing good for those that elect them, they have to must every few years, divert their attention to fighting electoral fights. Those who "own" the economy are in no such dilemma. In fact many of today's multinational companies have been in the hands of the same families for generations! This allows them a continuity that ensures that the ideas their companies believe and act on, stay firmly within the control of the few, "owners." Yet it has come to be seen as normal, "democracy," that governments, who represent the much more important interests of the Greater Good, must keep changing like a game of musical chairs.
In the UK & US, standard bearers of today's modern "democracy," the people generally vote between the limited choice of either/or.., in that their are really only two main political parties in both countries. This is again a device that has developed to give those who, "own," the economy, further power to control politics. As opposed to those in politics working together on proper behalf of the people, to ensure the means of production are fairly managed, politics becomes about, "opposing," sides. This takes away from the role of politicians being servants, "ministers," chosen to co-operate in representing the collective interests of the People.., reducing Politics to something quite similar to the UK's premiership football!!
The tension between Chelsea & Manchester United fans produces alot of emotion in the fans who truly believe in, and place confidence in, 'their,' teams... They even buy, 'their,' teams respective Tshirts & scarfs! Then they pay to watch the games, in stadiums they passionately feel are, 'theirs...' On another level, You have the teams' players and managers.., in whom fanatical fans missplace even more of their faith in.., Treating Mourinho like the, "Speacial One," who will fight it out for them on the football pitch.., Yet, the players and managers, despite what they may say in TV interviews and at press events, have a more realistic view, in that behind closed doors, they know that they know who thier true masters are. As shown by Mourinho's assertion about, no longer caring about Chelsea, within a day of his dismissal, managers and players are really only mercenaries, who play actually for whichever club offers them the best deal... Hence all in all, it takes little genius to see how the only people who really benefit from all the fans' hot air, are the few Owners & Shareholders... These are the Oppressor few who really control these clubs...
Yet, since in today's times, the common Zimbabwean is continually being conditioned to keep believeing in the idea that, the only way to have a proper say, is through the political process.., those who really, "own,'" the powerless political 'teams,' continue to enjoy good hiding cover. Just like England's reknowned football hooligans, already struggling Zimbabweans are being manipulated, into having it out with each other in the streets, over a meaningless illusion.
So to start actually addressing the real problems of hunger and hopelessness plaguing our land, (very economic, "sadza & nyama," issues..,) we must start asking the right questions... Which are; who has, "owned," who, "owns," and who is trying to, "own," the means of production in Zimbabwe?
Because our country is in such a position where our People are struggling for just basic development, (where development does not relate to our People gaining access to a wider choice of consumer things to buy.., BUT true development, in the sense of them achieving the means to sustainably feed, house and clothe themselves..,) the questions turn into, who are the real people fighting so hard to either, keep, maintain or gain the, "ownership," of our country's most basic means of production... Our very Land itself. Which brings us back to where the first Chimurenga began.
Coon of the Moment
Here I was, sitting, enjoying my wife's Sunday dinner, flicking between the numerous crap "24 hr news" stations (btw: which just loop the same 10min news for 24hrs), when suddenly I almost choked on my chicken! I see this Zimbabwean "Journalist" on Date Line (BBC 24) talking the most incredible coony type of trash.
This Tererai (which ironically means "listen carefully"), was publicly speaking on the behalf of the millions of Zimbabweans in the "Diaspora", but instead using this platform to raise the serious issues KILLING our people, he chose to "yeessir boss" for the puppet masters and blow their war trumpets on their behalf! No mention of the Sanctions, the racist media war.
I therefore, hereby award Tererai "The Coon of the Moment" crown!
What are his credentials?? Why the dodgy American accent?? Whats with the dodgy "African Cave Painting" coonic/kaffir shirt?? This guy is a peice of work/Sh** (you choose)!! I was waiting for him to start speaking in "Chilapa-lapa" and shine the BBC hosts shoes!!
Chinja maitiro, maitiro chinja!!!
You can watch the full Dateline from BBC's website or iPlay if you are somewhat sodo-masochistic, get it???... massir-kiss-tic?
Another interesting view on this clown!
Tererai Karimakwenda: Barking against sensibility and reason. Age of the African puppet.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)